If you caught my posts a few weeks back about some concerns with the Audacity project’s new owner, Jim Salter wrote another excellent piece that clarifies who this owner is and teases apart another bit of tension with the FLOSS community over a fork of MuseScore. https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2021/07/audacitys-new-owner-is-in-another-fight-with-the-open-source-community/#p3
This is how you know I am truly serious about bringing back a couple of old podcasts and starting a new one. I started to rewrite my media and feed management tools.
Who is going to FOSDEM on a few weeks? I mean, in addition to me?
Thinking about workshop on finding exoplanets with rust next at @rustbeltrust. Reminds me of @starstryder.
Thanks to @andrewhobden and @rustbeltrust, I have a tidy list of tasks to improve 1st time experience with Medallion.
I decided, I booked my travel for FOSDEM 18 in Feb. Thrilled to be visiting Brussels again.
Thinking about returning to Europe for the 1st time in years, to attend FOSDEM 18 in Brussels.
Klint Finley at Wired shares a good summary of the findings an some research Github conducted to understand the diversity of open source contributors. The results aren’t surprising and Finley highlights one of the most important consequence, how the low level of contribution from non-white, non-male people could make their ability to enter the profession that much more difficult. The article includes some good, broad advice for both companies supporting open source and community leaders.
Read More …
This time, I chat about some recent news stories that caught my attention, including:
- David Cameron capitulates to terror, proposes Britain’s USA Patriot Act
- Congressman: To stop ISIS, let’s shut down websites and social media
- Carnegie Mellon Says It Was Subpoenaed-And Not Paid-For Research On Breaking Tor
- Tor is getting a major security upgrade
- The Internet Will Always Suck
- FCC Refuses To Force Websites To Adhere To ‘Do Not Track,’ And That’s A Good Thing
- How to Baffle Web Trackers by Obfuscating Your Movements Online
- BitHub, an experiment in funding privacy OSS
- Google Public Policy Blog: A Step Toward Protecting Fair Use on YouTube
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.
I noticed an update from the GNU Privacy Guard project (gnupg or gpg) come across my feeds the other day. If you have received an email from me that has a digital signature if you know what that is or a bunch of gobblety-gook characters at the bottom if you don’t, the tool that makes those signatures possible is gnupg.
More people seem aware of what encryption is and why it is important. We have had a string of increasingly distressing leaks, the ones from Edward Snowden just the latest, about how many governments in presumed open societies are participating in some very questionable trawling of their citizens’ personal communications. For those still not sure why encryption is important, it is the one technology answer everyone can agree upon that allows individual citizens any sense of secrecy and privacy in their online communications, regardless of who may want to snoop on it and how well resourced those eavesdroppers may be.
gnupg is especially important as it is is both free of charge and freely licensed. That second point is critical, it means that gnupg is open to scrutiny from any expert to help ensure it is free of back doors or other problems that might compromise its effectiveness. For users of alternate operating systems like BSD and GNU/Linux, it is often the only choice for certain applications of encryption. Thankfully, it happens to be a usable and useful one that interoperates with the commercial, proprietary choices available to users of more mainstream operating systems.
That post from the gnupg folks? They are in clear need of help in terms of funding.
Work on GnuPG is mostly financed from donations. To continue maintaining GnuPG so to keep it strong and secure against the ever increasing mass surveillance we need your support. Until the end of November we received a total of 6584 € (~5500 net) donations for this year. Along with the 18000 € net from the Goteo campaign this paid for less than 50% of the costs for one developer.
For a critical project of this size two experienced developers are required for proper operation. This requires gross revenues of 120000 Euro per year. Unfortunately there is currently only one underpaid full time developer who is barely able to keep up with the work; see this blog entry for some backgound. Please help to secure the future of GnuPG and consider to donate to this project now.
Support for half of one developer for a project that could easily engage a handful, full time, year round. Do please consider making a donation and if you are unfamiliar with gnupg, spend some time on the project site. It really is a great tool.
Updated 2014-01-06: At the request of the primary author of gnupg, I changed the title and a reference to GNU/Linux in recognition of gnupg’s formal status as part of the umbrella GNU project.