The crowds have out done me at #FOSDEM, today. Will spend the rest of the day playing tourist. Tomorrow I will try to arrive early and camp in the Rust dev room, per suggestion, despite the mobile app saying it is full.
I am about two talks away from giving up for the day. Made into only one so far, everything else I tried had panick inducing crowds. #FOSDEM
All of the Rust sessions tomorrow appear to be full already at #FOSDEM. I think I will watch a few on live stream first thing before heading over.
Figuring out a bit too late how to get the most out of #FOSDEM with the mobile app.
Who is going to FOSDEM on a few weeks? I mean, in addition to me?
This article from Stanford has helped me understand why some of my colleagues when I worked directly on public policy were consistently more effective. My own insights about coalition building and using connections well really snapped into much clearer focus after reading this article.
Read More …
Jon Brodkin at Ars Technica as ever explains clearly how using the CRA to undo the FCC vote could work as well as the political likelihood of such an action succeeding. Part of me likes open internet supporters in Congress using the same act to preserve existing neutrality rules that was also used to undo consumer privacy protections earlier in the year. Another part of me wishes legislators would get on with what I think is really needful: a new piece of legislation to establish clear regulatory authority and constraints that is far better in step with the reality of the Internet than decades old telecom law.
Technology policy is hard to follow for the interested and invested. It is harder for a blogger and podcaster like me who wants in some way to make the legitimately complex issues in some way more understandable, to hopefully increase the number of people engaged in the very important, public discourse around these policy matters.
Mike Masnick at Techdirt unpacks a bit of Internet outrage around yet another tone deaf move by current FCC chair Pai. The sentiment that I think best sums up a piece that still is definitely worth the read is rightly angry but for the wrong reasons.
Why this is demotivating to me, on top of an an unrelated and overall lower energy level lately for all things technology lately, is that it makes the actual policy work so much harder. Signals from the public like open protests and calls to representatives are a very important contribution. However, when the rationale expressed in them is off base, if fuels exactly the kind of disregard that was critical to Pai and his supported in rolling back the rules around Network Neutrality.
Plumbing the depths of a new CI/CD system for $employer. Going slowly mad via docker-in-docker, volumes, and uid/gid mismatches. It would be so cool if I could get his last piece to work.
I had the great pleasure to see Tim O’Reilly speak in person at an open government event I attended years ago. Everything Cory relates in his expansive and glowing review of O’Reilly’s new book both rings true and makes for a compelling endorsement. This seems like a book that is both a bit overdue and very much primed for this particular moment.