“Here’s how that math works, Kurzweil explains: The design of the brain is in the genome.”
“DNA is a blueprint for developing a brain, not “running” one or even building a fully realized one.”
Is design not equatable to blueprint in your opinion? Is the reason you disagree with Kuzeweil because of your different use of terminology? I would agree that Kuzweil is wrong if he said: A.I. can be developed using the human genome, but he said brain not A.I.