- Recent ruling shores up DMCA safe harbor
David Kravets at Wired explains the ruling in the UMG v. Veoh suit, the second suit labeled against the video sharing site for the same issue. For its flaws, this is good evidence that at least the DMCA safe harbors can work as an acceptable compromise. Even better, it affirms that as long as the safe harbors are operated, services are not required to actively filter copyrighted content, an activity that has repeatedly squashed fair use where it has been undertaken.
- More on advanced usage tracking techniques
The EFF has a pretty good survey of the state of the art, going beyond traditional browser cookies. There are links to research specifically within the last year, especially on Flash cookies which are resistant to user control. This is the first time I’ve seen a Firefox plugin recommended, though, to try to help users wrest some control back from advertisers. This is the first of several parts, given how well linked and cited this is, I am looking forward to the future parts.
- A broadcast flag may be coming for the UK
The EFF explains about a consultation held at the request of the BBC that seeks to consider the question of content protection. The EFF reminds us of the risks of such a protection scheme, seen here in the US as a broadcast flag, in terms of stifling innovation. The proposed scheme here is a bit backhanded, an obscured compression of channel listing metadata, but the intent is obviously the same.
- Novell launches MonoTouch to bring .NET to the iPhone
At Ars, Ryan Paul explains how Novell got around the constraints on alternate runtimes and JIT compilers. I am actually a bit conflicted by this story. On the one hand, it is opening up the iPhone to alternate technologies and development environments making it more accessible. But on the other, it is .NET of which I am no fan mostly because of my concern that Microsoft will yank the rug from under Mono eventually.
- Explaining Microsoft’s, Google’s open tactics as self interest
I initially balked at this piece from Matt Asay as I think he was starting to give too much credit to Microsoft. He then took it in an interesting direction, though, proposing a theory for why both Google and Microsoft would make moves seemingly counter to their core business. There is a certain poetry to the notion that by explicitly giving customers support for the choice to leave, they are less likely to actually do so.