- IP stack in a tweet
Sure, it is the usual for fun kind of effort but it does make you wonder. Other folks have tried to push data compression to see what is possible with the 140 character limit. Why not do the same for nano-programs. I wonder what sort of sharing might be possible, though the more obvious scenarios involve attackers and spammers spreading malware nano-programs.
- Google to hand over IP addresses of Caribbean journalists
This WikiLeaks article makes it pretty clear that this is not a may for Google, but definitely a will. It is under the auspices of a libel suit, one of the few limits on free speech but I wonder if that claim holds water here. The statements deemed libelous were made as part of a government inquiry and at least the WikiLeaks article is careful to label them as allegations, not fact.
- A response to the good enough revolution
Mike Masnick offers a rebuttal on Techdirt to this story to which I linked earlier. Masnick’s post is well worth a read but in brief, basically contends that the good enough lamented in the Wired piece is actually best when measured correctly. Any shortcoming is a bias of the observer.
- Turing apology campaign gains momentum
The field of computing is lousy with some regrettable social ills, most notably a perverse gender bias. What happened to Turing at the hands of his own government makes these problems pale. I do like that those spear heading this campaign are open to their efforts having a benefit just by helping more people understand the importance of Turing’s contributions to modern computing. I genuinely hope they manage to achieve much more than that for this misunderstood pioneer.
- Wikipedia to color code edits from less trusted authors, editors
Mike Masnick has the details at Techdirt though many other sources are also pointing to this story. We’ll see how it works in practice but in theory I like the idea of an explicit signal that a source may need checking. It’s a subtle distinction from flagging the accuracy of the article itself, which may be high regardless of the contributor’s trust status. I think it is continuous with other changes the site has been making recently to improve quality of information.
- Lori Drew case dismissed for vagueness
Wired has the details of the judge’s written ruling following up on his ealrier decision in the case. The ruling speaks to the very problematic charge under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act from the lower court’s ruling, overturning for exactly the reasons we would hope. Namely that it sets a very dangerous precedent that encourages vague and over broad interpretation of the CFAA.