<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Programming Language Choice a Right?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thecommandline.net/2010/05/07/is-programming-language-choice-a-right/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thecommandline.net/2010/05/07/is-programming-language-choice-a-right/</link>
	<description>Podcast and blog exploring digital citizenry as a creator and a consumer.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 23:05:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Bogost</title>
		<link>http://thecommandline.net/2010/05/07/is-programming-language-choice-a-right/comment-page-1/#comment-4862</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Bogost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 22:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecommandline.net/2010/05/07/is-programming-language-choice-a-right/#comment-4862</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right that this is a legal rather than a technical limit, but that puts two questions in my brain: (1) What does the provocation of a legal constraint tell us about the assumptions we make about programming universality? (2) How should we construe Apple&#039;s insistence that their platform is a strongly determined combination of hardware and software? No answers, just questions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right that this is a legal rather than a technical limit, but that puts two questions in my brain: (1) What does the provocation of a legal constraint tell us about the assumptions we make about programming universality? (2) How should we construe Apple&#8217;s insistence that their platform is a strongly determined combination of hardware and software? No answers, just questions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

