Comments on: ICANN to Prohibit Redirect of DNS Misses http://thecommandline.net/2009/11/30/icann-to-prohibit-redirect-of-dns-misses/ Podcast and blog exploring digital citizenry as a creator and a consumer. Tue, 15 May 2012 23:05:47 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: Thomas Gideon http://thecommandline.net/2009/11/30/icann-to-prohibit-redirect-of-dns-misses/comment-page-1/#comment-3246 Thomas Gideon Tue, 01 Dec 2009 16:23:00 +0000 http://thecommandline.net/?p=1972#comment-3246 The memo, if it becomes policy, would only affect the operators of the top level domains, like .com, .net and .org. It wouldn't stop Verizon or T-Home from doing this. However, as the article points out, at least if the TLD servers behave as they are supposed to, then you can use a DNS other than your ISP's if you do not like their re-direct shenanigans. The memo, if it becomes policy, would only affect the operators of the top level domains, like .com, .net and .org. It wouldn’t stop Verizon or T-Home from doing this.

However, as the article points out, at least if the TLD servers behave as they are supposed to, then you can use a DNS other than your ISP’s if you do not like their re-direct shenanigans.

]]> By: Ryan http://thecommandline.net/2009/11/30/icann-to-prohibit-redirect-of-dns-misses/comment-page-1/#comment-3241 Ryan Mon, 30 Nov 2009 22:50:08 +0000 http://thecommandline.net/?p=1972#comment-3241 this can't come too soon, I hate it when Verizon or T-Home or anyone does this redirect... it's breaking a service whose behavior is set in an RFC. this can’t come too soon, I hate it when Verizon or T-Home or anyone does this redirect… it’s breaking a service whose behavior is set in an RFC.

]]>