<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Considering the Value of Digital Goods</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thecommandline.net/2009/09/30/considering-the-value-of-digital-goods/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thecommandline.net/2009/09/30/considering-the-value-of-digital-goods/</link>
	<description>Podcast and blog exploring digital citizenry as a creator and a consumer.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 03:51:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Gideon</title>
		<link>http://thecommandline.net/2009/09/30/considering-the-value-of-digital-goods/comment-page-1/#comment-2819</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Gideon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 13:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecommandline.net/2009/09/30/considering-the-value-of-digital-goods/#comment-2819</guid>
		<description>Sloppy thinking or no, the question is a valid one.  One well worth considering.

I don&#039;t think your nightmare is anything new, truth be told.  I think with each innovation making acquiring and enjoying works easier, there have been concerns about the negative impact.  In that past, though, I think those ran more towards diminishing of our capacities.  E.g. Souza and the loss of our singing voices due to the gramophone, Plato and the reduction of our memory and oratory capacities at the introduction of writing.

History largely has not born out those fears, though.  I think that will be true in this case, too.  Or, if your fears are a valid prediction, then the medium will flame out and be replaced by something that better supports a fuller range of human expression, not just mental and cultural candy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sloppy thinking or no, the question is a valid one.  One well worth considering.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think your nightmare is anything new, truth be told.  I think with each innovation making acquiring and enjoying works easier, there have been concerns about the negative impact.  In that past, though, I think those ran more towards diminishing of our capacities.  E.g. Souza and the loss of our singing voices due to the gramophone, Plato and the reduction of our memory and oratory capacities at the introduction of writing.</p>
<p>History largely has not born out those fears, though.  I think that will be true in this case, too.  Or, if your fears are a valid prediction, then the medium will flame out and be replaced by something that better supports a fuller range of human expression, not just mental and cultural candy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Miller</title>
		<link>http://thecommandline.net/2009/09/30/considering-the-value-of-digital-goods/comment-page-1/#comment-2818</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 13:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecommandline.net/2009/09/30/considering-the-value-of-digital-goods/#comment-2818</guid>
		<description>Thomas,

Thanks for the response. Both you and Patrick McLean have pointed out a couple of problems with my thinking about the costs of production of goods, and you are both correct. That was a bit of sloppy thinking on my part.

You points about the opportunity for digital goods are well taken. I believe, as you do, that there are some powerful opportunities there. And I appreciate your optimism. My nightmare scenario is buried in the subtext of the essay...that everything becomes a candybar, an impulse buy, and that no actual value is placed on a digital work. I truly hope your vision more accurate than my fear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thomas,</p>
<p>Thanks for the response. Both you and Patrick McLean have pointed out a couple of problems with my thinking about the costs of production of goods, and you are both correct. That was a bit of sloppy thinking on my part.</p>
<p>You points about the opportunity for digital goods are well taken. I believe, as you do, that there are some powerful opportunities there. And I appreciate your optimism. My nightmare scenario is buried in the subtext of the essay&#8230;that everything becomes a candybar, an impulse buy, and that no actual value is placed on a digital work. I truly hope your vision more accurate than my fear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

