<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TCLP 2007-11-18 News (Comment Line 360-252-7284)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thecommandline.net/2007/11/18/news_121/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thecommandline.net/2007/11/18/news_121/</link>
	<description>Podcast and blog exploring digital citizenry as a creator and a consumer.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 21:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: cmdln</title>
		<link>http://thecommandline.net/2007/11/18/news_121/comment-page-1/#comment-194</link>
		<dc:creator>cmdln</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 22:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.cmdln.net/?p=801#comment-194</guid>
		<description>Sensor networks, especially those deployed out of doors, would seem to have issues that a mesh would deal with extraordinarily well.  I'm thinking sporadic connectivity, specifically, caused by environmental conditions of all kinds.

Do sensor networks have favorable load characteristics for meshes, too?  The one remaining criticism implicit in that OnLAMP piece was the notion that meshes place more load on the network itself, versus loading some specific and centralized resource like servers.  Are sensor meshes low enough throughput to avoid any issues with that?  I'd have to imagine that would be so, that you'd have very small amounts of data, pretty much constantly, but on a periodic rather than a continuous basis.

May day job involves automation, more for security than sensing, but we've looked into adding sensors onto our products.  Think adding flood and fire sensors on top of being able to tell the state of secured doors and control their behaviors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sensor networks, especially those deployed out of doors, would seem to have issues that a mesh would deal with extraordinarily well.  I&#8217;m thinking sporadic connectivity, specifically, caused by environmental conditions of all kinds.</p>
<p>Do sensor networks have favorable load characteristics for meshes, too?  The one remaining criticism implicit in that OnLAMP piece was the notion that meshes place more load on the network itself, versus loading some specific and centralized resource like servers.  Are sensor meshes low enough throughput to avoid any issues with that?  I&#8217;d have to imagine that would be so, that you&#8217;d have very small amounts of data, pretty much constantly, but on a periodic rather than a continuous basis.</p>
<p>May day job involves automation, more for security than sensing, but we&#8217;ve looked into adding sensors onto our products.  Think adding flood and fire sensors on top of being able to tell the state of secured doors and control their behaviors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: minitotoro</title>
		<link>http://thecommandline.net/2007/11/18/news_121/comment-page-1/#comment-193</link>
		<dc:creator>minitotoro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 22:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.cmdln.net/?p=801#comment-193</guid>
		<description>Interesting discussion on mesh networking. While mesh networks may not show up in mainstream networks and applications for a while, there is quite a bit of work being done with them in regards to sensor networks. This may be a way in which mesh networking will slide into more wide spread use. I recently did some graduate work on a sensor network with mesh networking using junction tree protocol to setup and maintain the mesh. This type of use for mesh networks are already being used in areas such as such as monitoring soil moisture levels at wineries and monitoring temperature differences in blood storage facilities. If you are interested, I recommend you look into sensor networks (if you haven't yet). Very interesting stuff. I'm looking forward to see where this technology will end up in the long run.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting discussion on mesh networking. While mesh networks may not show up in mainstream networks and applications for a while, there is quite a bit of work being done with them in regards to sensor networks. This may be a way in which mesh networking will slide into more wide spread use. I recently did some graduate work on a sensor network with mesh networking using junction tree protocol to setup and maintain the mesh. This type of use for mesh networks are already being used in areas such as such as monitoring soil moisture levels at wineries and monitoring temperature differences in blood storage facilities. If you are interested, I recommend you look into sensor networks (if you haven&#8217;t yet). Very interesting stuff. I&#8217;m looking forward to see where this technology will end up in the long run.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
